High School Building Committee (HSBC) Meeting #51 Minutes

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Wayland High School

Commons Conference Room

 

Attendees

HSBC members:  Lea Anderson, , Josh Bekenstein, Dianne Bladon, Steve Breit, Jim Howard, David Lash,  Joe Lewin, Cindy Lombardo, Eric Sheffels, Jennifer Steel, Karen Talentino

Absent: Brian Chase, Fred Knight, Mary Lentz, Steve Tise

Ex Officio members: Joy Buhler, Gary Burton, Louis Jurist, Pat Tutwiler

HMFH:  George Metzger

Call to order Ð HSBC Chairman, Lea Anderson, called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.

 

Dr. Gary Burton introduced John Moynihan, Facilities Director for Wayland, to the HSBC.  John comes to Wayland with 25 years experience in facilities management.

 

MSBA Update Ð Lea reported that the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) at its Board of Directors meeting on Nov. 28, 2007, invited Wayland High School to move forward to the Feasibility Study phase of applying for state funding.  There were 423 Statements of Interest submitted from 162 districts.  91 of the SOIs are related to buildings that were rated 1 or 2 - in pretty good shape.  Wayland is one of 83 schools invited to proceed with the application process.  Of these 83 schools, 49 are invited to work on Feasibility Studies, 27 schools are invited to develop repair plans, and 7 schools are well into design or construction and are invited to work with the MSBA on project scope Ð basically a retroactive application for funding.  These schools are Bedford High School, Chelmsford High School, Thoreau Elementary School in Concord, Meadow Brook Primary in East Long Meadow, Plymouth River Elementary School in Hingham, Manchester JHS/SHS in Manchester-Essex Regional School District, and the L.D. Batcheldor Elementary School in North Reading.

 

The MSBA has defined a rolling capital pipeline of $2.5 billion spread over five years.  The MSBA will introduce projects into this pipeline as they are deemed ready.  Each school district has identified one priority project for a total of 162 projects.  In addition to the 83 selected, there are 45 schools on hold, which the MSBA will work with to clarify their SOIs.

 

The invitation to collaborate on a Feasibility Study is not approval of a project and the MSBA is advising towns to Òproceed with cautionÓ.  The MSBA lays out next steps in very general terms.  They are to select an OwnerÕs Project Manager subject to approval by the MSBA, to select a Feasibility Designer through the MSBAÕs Designer Selection Panel, to submit the Initial Compliance Certification, and to execute a Feasibility Study Agreement with the MSBA detailing scope, schedule, milestones and cost-sharing parameters of the Feasibility Study.

 

The MSBA has assigned Wayland a Òcase workerÓ named Sean Walsh.  Walsh was one of three people to visit WHS on June 14th to assess crowded conditions.  He has contacted Wayland and set up a first meeting on February 13th with Gary Burton, Joy Buhler, Fred Turkington, Barb Fletcher, and Lea Anderson.

 

The HSBC discussed preparation for this meeting.  Committee  members suggested sending a memo to the MSBA during January with a suggested set of issues to cover Ð we should set the agenda, as much as possible.  The MSBA already has copies of all the studies and reports. We should aim to avoid a detailed deluge of information at this first meeting.

 

Dr. Burton asked Sean Walsh if the HSBC should proceed with an Owners Project Manager search.  We are advised to wait until after the meeting.

 

George Metzger said that his impression from meeting with MSBA officials is that they are open to seeing what an applicant has done and seeing how relevant that work is.  They will not make us redo things if what was done is relevant.  He said that the OPM selection will be done by the local community with approval from the MSBA.  He also noted that the MSBA has engaged Innovation Information Consultants to advise on enrollment.

 

Eric Sheffels reported that he had spoken with Charlie Buuck of Turner Construction who confirmed that Turner was closing down their K-12 education division.  Eric advised the group to proceed with a search for a new Owners Project Manager at the appropriate time.

 

Report on Construction Manager at Risk Ð Joy Buhler, Business Manager for the Wayland Public Schools recently attended a seminar comparing ÒDesign Ð Bid Ð BuildÓ (M.G.L. c. 149) to ÒConstruction Manager at RiskÓ (M.G.L. c. 149A).  Joy also has been recently recertified as a Massachusetts Certified Public Purchasing Official by the Inspector GeneralÕs Office.  This certification is a requirement of the MSBA regulations.

 

Joy presented a summary of the differences between the two approaches to design and construction.  Under Chapter 149 (Design-Bid-Build) there are three distinct phases to a public construction project: the architectural design and development of plans and specifications; the bidding and award of the construction contract; and the actual construction of the building.  This process entails advertising for required sub-bids for trade contracts in 17 different areas, opening filed sub-bids, evaluating and qualifying sub-bidders, and then opening bids from a General Contractor (GC), awarding the contract to a qualified bidder with the lowest price.  A fixed price contract is awarded to the general contractor and construction begins, with the owner responsible for additional price increases resulting from change orders and unforeseen latent conditions.  This approach has been used on all school projects in Wayland to date.

 

Under Chapter 149A (Construction Manager at Risk) the Construction Manager or General Contractor (CM/GC) is brought in during the design process to work with the architect as design documents, plans and specifications are being developed, providing construction-related recommendations during the design phase.  Selection of the CM/GC is a two-phase process:  a Prequalification Committee issues an RFQ and selects at least three qualified firms to receive the OwnerÕs RFP.  A Selection Committee reviews and evaluates proposals for both price and technical components before selecting a firm.  Under c. 149A, the qualifications of the CM/GC can be considered as well as the price, and the Owner has the ability to select a firm other than the one coming in at the lowest price.  The contract with the CM/GC is Òcost-plusÓ, not a lump sum price contract, with set fees for preconstruction and construction services plus a Òguaranteed maximum priceÓ (GMP) that is negotiated with the CM/GC at some point later in the process Ð no earlier than when design documents are 60% complete, but as late as 100% complete.

 

Under c.149A the Owner is required to pre-qualify and bid all trade contracts over $20,000 and award the trade contract to the lowest pre-qualified bidders.  Fast tracking of a project is possible as trade contracts can be bid and issued and construction can begin once the design work for that phase is completed.

 

Joy reported that there are only 11 municipalities that have received authorization to use Construction Manager at Risk, most of which are for school construction projects.  The MSBA regulations allow communities to consider using Construction Manager at Risk.  (The MSBA may allocate up to 1% reimbursement for approved projects using CM/R construction delivery method.)

 

CM/R is more complex.  Wayland would need to apply to the Inspector GeneralÕs Office for approval to use c. 149A.  The process requires certification from the local governing body (which body is unclear Ð Town Meeting, Selectmen, School Committee, HSBC?).  Joy sees a need for more in house expertise to handle the increased administrative elements of CM/R.

 

 

Comments from the HSBC followed:

            - A project is allowed to revert to c.149 from 149A at any time.

- In the commercial world CM/R is always used.

            - Big construction companies like Gilbane and Dimeo prefer CM/R.

            - Chapter 149 is very adversarial.  Owner has no control.

- With 149A (CM/R), Owner gets to pre-qualify and  has a better vested interest.  It is more time consuming, however.

- CM/R might cost more going in, but costs less coming out.

- CM/R seems to have more flexibility.  Owner gets to pick the CM/GC they want and value engineer as they go.

- We would rely on our OPM to do much of the administrative work.  When selecting OPM, we must consider this.  OPM is critical.

- Is there any ground work we should be doing prior to the MSBA allowing us to begin OPM selection?

- The contract the state requires is ridiculous.  OPMs might be unwilling to sign it because of liability issues.

 

Both Joy and John Moynihan reiterated that CM/R is an enormous task and expressed concern that Wayland does not have the capacity to absorb this size project without help.  The HSBC reiterated that this will be an important point when we advertise for an OPM.

 

Communications Ð Lea asked the group for comments on what the HSBC should be doing at this point to communicate with the public.  It was suggested that not much will happen until the MSBA gives us direction.  We should continue to encourage people to attend our meetings and be as open as we have been in the past.  The process with the state could be very slow, so it does not make sense to set up forums until there is something to do.

 

The redesigned web site is nearly ready for review by the HSBC.  Once it is ready for public access, the HSBC will use it to provide up to date information.  It was suggested that we take advantage of all the electronic and other newsletters in town to get information out.  It was also suggested that we engage people at an overview level this time and not inundate them with a lot of detailed ÒbureaucraticÓ information.

 

Dr. Burton was asked to use his Town Crier column to discuss high school issues- such as the thinking that goes into spending emergency funds to repair the high school versus making do until the town agrees on a solution.

 

It was agreed that a timetable from the MSBA will drive a communications plan.

 

Motion Ð A motion was made by Josh Bekenstein and seconded by Joe Lewin to approve the minutes of HSBC meeting #50 held on Thursday, October 18, 2007.

 

Vote Ð The motion was approved unanimously - 11 in favor, 0 opposed

 

Comments from observers: There were no comments.

 

Adjournment Ð The HSBC adjourned at 9:2050 p.m.

 

Observers:  Janet Correia, Sam DiSavino, John Moynihan, Lisa Valone